The Director may delegate any of the duties listed in `C' to assistants, but he is not thereby
relieved of responsibility for their correct performance.
If the Director has given a ruling that he or the Chief Director subsequently determines to be
incorrect, and if no rectification will allow the board to be scored normally, he shall award an
adjusted score, considering both sides as non-offending for that purpose.
If the Director believes that a review of his decision on a point of fact or exercise of his
discretionary power might be in order (as when he awards an adjusted score under Law 12),
he shall advise a contestant of his right to appeal or may refer the matter to an appropriate committee.
If no penalty is prescribed by law, and there is no occasion for him to exercise his discretionary
powers, he directs the players to proceed with the auction or play.
If the Law gives the Director a choice between a specified penalty and the award of an adjusted
score, he attempts to restore equity, resolving any doubtful point in favour of the
non-offending side.
If an irregularity has occurred for which no penalty is provided by law, the Director awards an
adjusted score if there is even a reasonable possibility that the non-offending side was
damaged, notifying the offending side of its right to appeal (see Law 81C9).
If the Director is unable to determine the facts to his satisfaction, he shall make a ruling that
will permit play to continue, and notify the players of their right to appeal.
When the Director chooses to award an artificial adjusted score of average plus or average minus in IMP play, that score is +3 IMPs or -3 IMPs respectively.
When the Director assigns non-balancing adjusted scores (see Law 12C) in knockout play,
each contestant's score on the board is calculated separately. The average of the two scores is
then assigned to both contestants.
The Director shall not exercise his Law 6 authority to order one board redealt when the final
result of a match without that board could be known to a contestant. Instead, he awards an
adjusted score.
A board is considered to be ``fouled'' if the Director determines that one or more cards were
misplaced in the board, in such manner that contestants who should have had a direct score
comparison did not play the board in identical form.
In scoring a fouled board the Director determines as closely as possible which scores were
made on the board in its correct form, and which in the changed form. He divides the score on
that basis into two groups, and rates each group separately as provided in the regulations of
the sponsoring organisation.
In some forms of team contests, the sponsoring organisation may prescribe a redeal (see Law 6)
In a pair or individual event, when a non-offending contestant is required to take an artificial
adjusted score through no fault or choice of his own, such contestant shall be awarded a
minimum of 60% of the matchpoints available to him on that board, or the percentage of
matchpoints he earned on boards actually played during the session if that percentage was
greater than 60%.
In individual events, the Director shall enforce the penalty provisions of these Laws, and the
provisions requiring the award of adjusted scores, equally against both members of the
offending side, even though only one of them may be responsible for the irregularity. But the
Director, in awarding adjusted scores, shall not assess procedural penalty points against the
offender's partner, if, in the Director's opinion, he is in no way responsible for the violation.
The Director, in addition to enforcing the penalty provisions of these Laws, may also assess
penalties for any offence that unduly delays or obstructs the game, inconveniences other
contestants, violates correct procedure, or requires the award of an adjusted score at another
table.
In performing his duty to maintain order and discipline, the Director is specifically
empowered to assess disciplinary penalties in points or to suspend a contestant for the current
session or any part thereof (the Director's decision under this clause is final).
The Director is specifically empowered to disqualify a contestant for cause, subject to approval
by the Tournament Committee or sponsoring organisation.